What was the ruling of the Supreme Court regarding the federal line-item veto?

The Supreme Court ruled that the federal line-item veto was unconstitutional. The case, Clinton v. City of New York (1998), centered around the line-item veto authority granted to the President by Congress in 1996. The Court determined that this authority violated the Presentment Clause of the Constitution, which outlines the procedure for how legislation is enacted. Specifically, the ruling emphasized that the President cannot unilaterally amend or repeal sections of duly enacted statutes; this power is reserved for Congress. This decision reinforced the principle of separation of powers by maintaining the legislative authority of Congress over the budgetary process, hence the declaration of the federal line-item veto as unconstitutional aligns with the constitutional framework intended by the Founding Fathers.